Legislation Tracker
Which countries are taking measures that encourage companies to contribute to the Cali Fund?
The international agreement establishing the Cali Fund invites countries to "take administrative, policy or legislative measures" that incentivise contributions to the Cali Fund.
0
countries with legislation encouraging Cali Fund contributions
0
countries where such legislation is under discussion
Peru
- Friends of the Cali Fund Member: no
- CBD Party
- Nagoya Party
- BBNJ Agreement Signatory
- No Legislation or administrative measure proposed yet (reached)
- Legislation or administrative measure proposed
- Legislation introduced
- Legislation passed into law
- Legislation or administrative measure in effect
Overview
Peru has not introduced a new measure specifically designed to incentivise contributions to the Cali Fund. However, its existing national ABS framework already covers DSI providing a domestic basis for benefit-sharing from the utilisation of genetic resources, including DSI.
Proposed legislation / administrative measure
Key developments
March 2026 - Ministry of Environment (MINAM) and the British Embassy held a 'Business dialogue on the Cali Fund' with the private sector; the Vice-Minister described the Fund as an important global innovation.
Statements
4 August 2026, SBI-7 plenary - Peru described the Mechanism and the Cali Fund as complementary, and benefit-sharing from DSI as a substantive obligation and pillar of the Convention, not an option (ENB).
July 2026 - David Castro Garro of Peru's Ministry of Environment: 'Donations and royalties are completely different things' (Dialogue Earth).
ABS legislation
Andean Community Decision 391 (1996); Supreme Decree No. 003-2009-MINAM approving the Regulation on Access to Genetic Resources, the country's principal ABS instrument; Law 26839 on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity; Law 27811 establishing the protection regime for the collective knowledge of Indigenous peoples; Law 28216 creating the National Anti-Biopiracy Commission; Supreme Decrees 018-2015 and 019-2015-MINAGRI on forest and wildlife management; Andean Decision 486 for patent disclosure.
Regulatory context
Peru's ABS regime defines genetic resources to include genetic information contained in organisms, including digitally stored or generated sequences, so DSI use triggers benefit-sharing. Non-commercial users must identify at least three non-monetary benefits, two of them mandatory; commercial access contracts must include monetary benefits, with annual royalties of at least 1% of net sales of marketed products (which may be offset by investments). The National Anti-Biopiracy Commission monitors patents and the misappropriation of Peruvian resources.
